Summary of Characteristics
of BRT
Across the case studies there is a wide range of BRT services and
facilities that reflect specific community needs and resources. The
principal features by system discussed above, and geographic area
are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Number of Facilities with Specific Features
Feature |
US / Canada |
Australia / Europe |
South America |
|
% of Total Number of Systems
|
| Dedicated Running Ways |
14 |
8 |
6 |
28 |
90 |
| Stations |
14 |
7 |
3 |
24 |
77 |
| Distinctive Vehicles |
9 |
5 |
3 |
17 |
55 |
| Off-Vehicle Fare Collection |
2 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
26 |
| ITS |
9 |
4 |
3 |
16 |
52 |
| Frequent All-Day Service |
13 |
8 |
6 |
27 |
87 |
| Total Systems Surveyed |
16 |
9 |
6 |
31 |
100 |
Over 90% of the systems profiled have some type of exclusive running
ways, either a bus-only road or bus lane. More than 85% provide frequent
all-day service, and 75% have serious “stations” rather
than simple stops. In contrast, only about 55 percent have
distinctive vehicles (in design/type/livery) and roughly 50% feature
some type of ITS application. Only 8 systems of the list surveyed
above, roughly 26%, have off-board fare collection.
It should be noted that the percentage of systems with an increasing
number of BRT elements is going up as the more recent applications,
e.g., Las Vegas MAX and San Pablo Blvd Rapid Bus (Oakland, California)
are much more complete systems.
Six existing systems (Bogotá’s TransMilenio, Curitiba,
Rouen, Paris, London and Quito’s Trolebus) have all six basic
BRT elements; while several other systems have four of the six primary
elements. Systems under development in Boston, Cleveland, and Eugene
will also have all six BRT elements, while Las Vegas MAX, opened
in July 2004, also has all six.
Currently in North America, only Ottawa and Las Vegas have off-board
fare collection; however, Boston’s Silver Line Phase 2 will
also have this feature.
Currently within the United States and Canada, 14 of 16 systems
have dedicated running ways (bus lanes or busways), 13 have stations,
11 have all-day service, seven feature ITS elements, and two systems
have off-board fare collection.
As a final summary note, a TCRP survey, done in 2000/2001 covered
the first increment of a number of systems that have added features
and evolved over time. For example, the system in Los Angeles is
as of this writing, in the process of adding specialized BRT vehicles
to the fleet operating its various Metro Rapid Bus Routes, while
Boston is beginning installation of its Smart-Card based fare collection
system that should enable much more efficient boarding on the first
Phase of its Silver BRT line (Phase II subway stations have fare
gates controlling access to station platforms.)
Author: Ian McNamara
|